5.6 Complex Numbers and Functions: Exploring Mathematics Through Text

In the previous section, you practised reading and performing dialogues (spoken communication) about mathematics, and explored written communication through email correspondence. In this section, you will focus on longer written mathematical communication. This book uses several different types of text across the chapters. This gives you exposure to a variety of mathematical writing.

The text below is an authentic example of a fictional assessment brief, designed to help students understand what a real assessment brief looks like. It uses a module (MA123 Complex Numbers) from a fictional university with realistic assessment structures, learning outcomes, and grading criteria. The guidance on academic integrity and Generative AI use reflects current university standards.

Your task is to read the text and work through the activities. The activities have a logical structure: they begin with more global or whole-text activities, that examine the purpose and audience of the text, and they gradually narrow to a focus on individual language items. In mathematical writing, there is an inherent connection between ‘macro’ text-external elements (such as audience and purpose) and ‘micro’ text-internal aspects (such as individual words and phrases).

By working through the various activities below, you will be able to:

  • Work with extended mathematical prose texts to enhance your understanding of both mathematical concepts and the structure of mathematical writing.

  • Identify and develop your command of useful academic phrases and sentence structures within text.

  • Apply this language in your own writing and mathematical discussions.

 

Activity 1: The overall audience and purpose of the text

The purpose of this activity is to help you think about three features of a text: its audience (who reads it), its purpose (why it was written), and its structure (how it is organised). Academic writing takes many different forms. Each form has its own conventions, purposes, and ways of organising information. Noticing these differences will help you become a stronger academic reader and writer.

Question 1: The text below is an assessment brief for a mathematics module at a fictional university. An assessment brief is a document that tells students what they will be assessed on, how they will be assessed (e.g., exam, coursework), and practical information such as submission dates and marking criteria. Before you read the Assessment Brief below, think of some things you would expect to find in an assessment brief. For example, you would expect to find submission deadlines for any assessments. Next, select the ‘Answer’ button below.

Answer

An assessment brief is likely to contain some of the following:

  1. names of different assessment components
  2. the percentage weightings of the different components
  3. whether a component is formative (does not count towards the final mark; for practice and feedback) or summative (counts towards the final mark)
  4. a description of the task
  5. the submission date and submission format and when and how feedback will be returned
  6. materials that may be required or prohibited for any assessment task
  7. policies on the use of artificial intelligence
  8. re-sit policies.

All of these elements appear in the assessment brief you will read below.

Question 2: Read Section 1 of the Assessment Brief. Four students have made notes summarising the assessment structure. Unfortunately, only one student's notes are fully accurate. Which one?

  • Student A: In chronological order: Worksheets (formative, 0%), followed by a Mid-term test and Reflection (30%), then a Final exam (70%).
  • Student B: Two formative components at 0%. Two summative components with a 30:70 split - the first being a Reflection, the second being the Final examination.
  • Student C: Four components in total: two formative and two summative. The formative components are the Worksheets and a Mid-term reflection in week 5. The summative components are a Mid-term test (30%) and a Final exam (70%).
  • Student D: Two formative components consisting of two sets of worksheets (both 0%) and two summative components: a mid-term test (30%) and a final examination (70%).

Next, select the ‘Answer’ button below.

Answer

Student C is the only student to have made fully correct notes. Student A has incorrectly recorded the Reflection as carrying 30% of the marks when, as a formative task, it carries 0%. Student B's notes are correct regarding the formative tasks but incorrectly identify the 30% summative component as the Reflection. In fact, the Reflection is formative and carries 0% of the marks. Student D's notes fail to record the Reflection component at all.

 


 

Assessment Brief: MA123 Complex Numbers

1. Key Information

Module Leader: James Jamieson (j.z.jamieson@northbury.edu.ac.uk)
Office Hours: Mondays and Wednesdays 15:00 - 16:00

Assessment Structure:

  • Weekly Problem Sheets (Formative - 0%)
  • Mid-term Test (Summative - 30%)
  • Mid-term Reflection (Formative - 0%)
  • Final Examination (Summative - 70%)

The formative problem sheets and the mid-term test develop both practical skills and conceptual understanding, giving you multiple opportunities to learn and improve before the final examination.

Week Assessment Submission
1-4 Problem Sheets 1-4 N/A
5 Mid-term Test In examination hall
5 Mid-term Reflection Via Learning Platform (Minerva)
6-8 Problem Sheets 6-8 N/A
9 Revision Week
10 Final Examination In examination hall

2. Learning Outcomes (LOs) assessed

By the end of this module, you will be able to:

  • LO1: Perform arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) on complex numbers in Cartesian form
  • LO2: Convert between Cartesian and polar forms and apply De Moivre's theorem to compute powers
  • LO3: Find complex roots of polynomial equations and apply the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
  • LO4: Represent complex numbers on an Argand diagram and interpret geometric transformations (addition, multiplication, conjugation)
  • LO5: Apply complex numbers to solve problems in mathematics, science and engineering contexts
  • LO6: Construct clear mathematical arguments, show all working, and justify solution methods
  • LO7: Reflect on your own learning progress and provide constructive feedback to peers

3. Assessment Component 1: Weekly Problem Sheets

Weekly problem sheets are a key learning tool. They help you practise the material covered in lectures. Problem sheets are set weekly in Weeks 1-4 and 6-8 (Week 5 is the mid-term test, and Week 9 is revision week). No mark is awarded (they count 0% towards your final mark), but they are essential for learning. There is no strict deadline.

Content:

  • Weeks 1-2: Arithmetic operations, conjugate, modulus
  • Weeks 3-4: Argument, Argand diagram, geometric transformations
  • Weeks 6-8: De Moivre's theorem, polynomial roots, applications

Feedback: Full worked solutions will be provided within 7 days. These model clear mathematical communication. Ask your tutor in tutorials or office hours if you want to discuss any questions.

4. Assessment Component 2: Mid-term Test (30% of module mark)
Week 5, 90 minutes, in-class examination

Content: The first half of the module (Weeks 1-5): Complex number arithmetic, modulus, argument, Argand diagram representation, basic polar form.

Question structure:

  • Computational questions (60% of marks)
  • Proof/reasoning questions (40% of marks)

Prohibited materials:

  • No calculator is allowed
  • No formula sheet will be provided
  • You may not bring notes or other materials

Example questions:

  • Computational: Compute [latex](1 + 2i) / (2 - i)[/latex] and express in the form a + bi
  • Proof/reasoning: Prove that [latex]|z_1 z_2| = |z_1| |z_2|[/latex] for all complex numbers [latex]z_1[/latex], [latex]z_2[/latex]

Feedback: Your test will be marked and returned within 10 days. General feedback on common errors and topics requiring further revision will be given in lectures. The module leader is available during office hours to discuss your individual performance.

5. Assessment Component 3: Mid-term Reflection

Week 5, due within 3 days after the mid-term test

The mid-term reflection is a formative activity designed to help you consolidate your learning and develop reflective practice. It also gives you experience in giving constructive peer feedback.

What to do:

  • Record a 1–2 minute video reflecting on what you have learnt in Weeks 1–5
  • Submit your video via Minerva by the deadline
  • The system will randomly pair you with another student who has also submitted
  • Watch your peer's video and provide constructive feedback (approximately 50–100 words)

What to include in your reflection:

Reflect on the key concepts you have understood well and identify any topics you found challenging. Discuss how you prepared for the mid-term test and outline what you plan to focus on in the second half of the module.

What to include in your peer feedback:

Provide one specific strength you noticed and one suggestion for improvement or an alternative perspective. Briefly mention what you personally took away from listening to their reflection, and ensure your feedback is constructive and encouraging.

Feedback: You should give peer feedback by the end of Week 6. Remember that this is a formative activity; no marks will be awarded, but engaging with it will strengthen your understanding and your ability to communicate mathematically.

6. Assessment Component 4: Final Examination (70% of module mark)

Week 10, 2 hours in-class examination

Content: The whole module.

Question structure:

  • Computational questions (50% of marks)
  • Proof/reasoning questions (30% of marks)
  • Application and extended problem-solving (20% of marks)

Permitted and excluded materials:

  • Non-programmable calculator (Please ensure that your calculator conforms to the requirements specified in the student handbook)
  • Formula sheet (provided by invigilator, listing key identities and theorems)
  • You may not bring notes or other materials

Example questions:

  • Computational: Using De Moivre's theorem compute [latex](1 + i)^{10}[/latex]
  • Reasoning/proof: Explain why every polynomial, with real coefficients, of odd degree, has at least one real root
  • Application: A robotic arm is positioned at point [latex]P[/latex] represented by the complex number [latex]z = 3 + 2i[/latex]. The arm rotates [latex]90^\circ[/latex] counter-clockwise about the origin. Find the new position of the robotic arm.

Feedback: Results will be released within 15 working days. General feedback on common issues will be provided in lectures. Individual feedback is available by contacting the module leader. Marks for the module will be conditional until the exam board at the end of the semester.

7. How to Succeed in the Module

Systematically attempt all problem sheet questions before looking at the provided worked solutions. Always show all your working, even for simple calculations, and thoroughly check your answers against the provided solutions. Use tutorials effectively to ask about questions you found difficult. For the mid-term test, revise material from Weeks 1-5 thoroughly and practise under timed conditions using past papers. Complete the mid-term reflection to consolidate your learning and benefit from peer perspectives. For the final examination, use feedback from the mid-term and problem sheets to identify weak areas, then revise all material systematically. Practise reasoning and proof questions, not just computations. Work through past papers under exam conditions. Attend the revision sessions in Week 9 to consolidate your learning.

8. Assessment Criteria

Class Description Mark range
First-Class Correct mathematics throughout. All working shown clearly. Reasoning is sound and well-communicated. Shows deep understanding of concepts. 70–100%
Upper Second-Class Nearly all mathematics correct. Working shown for most parts. Reasoning present but occasionally lacks clarity. Shows solid understanding with minor errors that don't substantially affect final answer. 60–69%
Lower Second-Class Mathematics largely correct but with some errors. Working shown but may be incomplete. Reasoning present but sometimes unclear. Shows adequate understanding of main concepts. 50–59%
Third-Class Basic mathematics correct but with some significant errors present. Working shown for key steps. Reasoning limited but some concepts understood. Shows some understanding with notable errors 40–49%
Fail Mathematics contains substantial errors. Working absent or seriously incorrect. Reasoning unclear or missing. Shows little evidence of understanding. 0–39%

Note: Unlike secondary school, marks above 90% are rarely awarded at university. Achieving 70–85% represents strong, excellent performance.

Specific criteria for different question types:

Computational questions:

  • Correct final answer with all working shown: full marks
  • Correct method with arithmetic error: most marks awarded
  • Incorrect method or no working shown: no marks

Reasoning/proof questions:

  • Complete, logically sound argument: full marks
  • Correct reasoning but incomplete proof: partial credit awarded for valid reasoning steps demonstrated
  • Attempted reasoning with significant gaps or unjustified assertions: minimal credit or no marks

Application questions:

  • Correct problem identification, appropriate method, correct solution: full marks
  • Correct identification and method, but computational error: most marks awarded
  • Problem identified but inappropriate or missing method: no marks or minimal marks
  • Clear explanation of what the solution means in context: additional consideration in borderline cases

9. Support Available

  • Lectures & tutorials: Lectures introduce concepts while tutorials allow you to ask questions and work through problems
  • Office hours: Mondays and Wednesdays 15:00 - 16:00 (no booking needed)
  • Q&A Minerva forum: Post questions here and discuss with your peers. The module leader monitors the forum regularly
  • Past papers: Available during revision week (Week 9)

Reassessment:

If you score below 40% on the whole module, you are entitled to reassessment (usually in the next assessment period). This typically takes the form of an examination covering all learning outcomes. Contact the module leader to discuss support before reassessment.

10. Academic Integrity & Generative AI Policy

  • All work must be your own
  • In problem sets, you may discuss ideas with peers but must write your own solutions
  • In tests and exams, all work must be entirely your own (no collaboration permitted)

See the student handbook for the full School's policy.

Problem Sheets & Mid-term reflection: Amber (Assistive role permitted):

Problem sheets are learning tools for you to check your understanding of the content. You may use AI in an assistive role to support your understanding. This means you can use AI tools to help you learn, but not to do the work for you. For example, you might ask "Can you explain The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra?" However, you should attempt each problem independently first. The goal is to develop your own problem-solving skills. Using AI to generate complete solutions defeats the purpose.

You may use AI to help structure your reflection or refine your language, but the content must be your own thoughts and experiences. For peer feedback, AI may be used to check grammar, but comments must be your own authentic response.

Mid-term and Final Exams: RED (AI tools cannot be used):

These are formal summative assessments that measure what you have learned. They are invigilated, in-person exams, under timed conditions so AI tools cannot be used.


 

Activity 2: The language of assessment criteria

Section 8 of the Assessment Brief presents vital information in table form about the assessment criteria. This table reflects standard UK academic practices in terms of grade percentages and description language. However, the three-column format (showing class, description, and numerical value) is used more widely than just in UK universities.

Question 1: (Noticing gradations of language in assessment descriptions)

The first sentence of each descriptor describes the quality of the mathematics. These sentences are reproduced below:

  1. Correct mathematics throughout.
  2. Nearly all mathematics correct.
  3. Mathematics largely correct.
  4. Basic mathematics correct but with some significant errors present.
  5. Substantial mathematical errors.

Study the graded language in these sentences.

Study the graded language in these sentences. Notice how the language relates closely to the degree class and percentage. For example: a) Correct mathematics throughout is a short, clear statement indicating that all the mathematics is correct.

When we say this language is 'short', we mean the grammar is an abbreviated (shortened) version of standard English sentences.

A fuller version of a) would be:

  • The mathematics is correct throughout, or,
  • There is correct mathematics throughout.

Similarly, b) Nearly all mathematics correct is an abbreviation of:

  • Nearly all the mathematics is correct

We can call these abbreviated sentences. The structure of abbreviated language differs across descriptors:

  • Description a: Adjective (Correct) + noun (mathematics) + preposition (throughout)
  • Description b: modified quantifier (Nearly all) + noun (mathematics) + adjective (correct).

Your task: Look back at the assessment criteria table and study the other sentences in each description. For each sentence, identify its function (what does it tell you about?), and then note down any phrases that indicate the decreasing level of attainment across the grade bands. You may also wish to reflect on the nature of the abbreviated language (how does the grammar change across different descriptions?) Next, select the ‘Answer’ button below.

Answer

The second sentence relates to how much working is shown. This describes how clear and explicit the answer is in terms of the step-by-step process of the calculations. The language reflects decreasing levels of attainment as follows: clearly shown shown for most parts > may be incomplete > absent or seriously incorrect.

Abbreviated language:

  1. All working clearly shown → All working is clearly shown. Useful language: clearly shown.
  2. Working shown for most parts → Working is shown for most parts. Useful language: prepositional phrase for most parts.
  3. Working shown but may be incomplete → Working is shown but this may be incomplete. Useful language may be incomplete (note that the negative adjective for complete is incomplete).
  4. Working shown for key steps → Working is shown for key steps. Useful language: key steps.
  5. Working absent or seriously incorrect → Working is absent or incorrect. Useful language: incorrect (note that incorrect is the negative adjective of correct).

The abbreviated language here is the relevant part of the verb be (is) and one instance of this. 

The third sentence relates to how clear or sound the mathematics reasoning or argument is. The language reflects decreasing levels of attainment as follows: sound and well communicated occasionally lacks clarity > sometimes unclear > limited unclear or missing. 

Abbreviated language:

  1. Reasoning is sound and well communicated.→ no abbreviations
  2. Reasoning present but occasionally lacks clarity. → Reasoning is present …
  3. Reasoning present but sometimes unclear. → Reasoning is present but is sometimes unclear.
  4. Reasoning limited but some concepts understood. → Reasoning is limited but some concepts are understood.
  5.  Reasoning unclear or missing. → Reasoning is unclear or is missing.

As in the second sentence, the abbreviated language here is the relevant part of the verb be (is/are).

The fourth sentence relates to the degree of understanding demonstrated. The language reflects decreasing levels of attainment as follows, mainly in adjectival forms: deep understanding solid understanding > adequate understanding some understanding with notable errors > little evidence of understanding > notable errors.

  1. Shows deep understanding of concepts. → Shows deep understanding of (the) concepts.
  2. Shows solid understanding with minor errors that don't substantially affect final answer. → Shows solid …
  3. Shows adequate understanding of main concepts. → Shows an adequate understanding of the main concepts.
  4. Shows some understanding with notable errors. → No abbreviations
  5. Shows little evidence of understanding. → No abbreviations

Unlike previous sections, the abbreviated language here focuses on the dropping of articles: a(n) and the.

 

Question 2:  (Writing a descriptor for an Excellent level of attainment)

In contemporary UK undergraduate assessment, 70% or above represents a First-Class degree. However, some UK assessment criteria include an additional descriptor for work that is exceptional. This is sometimes called a Strong First and may be set at 80% or above.

Your task: Using the language patterns from the assessment criteria table, write a description for exceptional work. Follow the same four-sentence structure used in the table: quality of mathematics, working shown, reasoning, understanding demonstrated. Using the language of the table, write a descriptor following the model of those in the table, for work that is exceptional.

Example for sentence 1 (quality of mathematics): Correct mathematics throughout which demonstrates knowledge going beyond the content of the lectures as well as creativity, insight or innovation and is presented entirely correctly with all mathematical formalisms entirely error free. 

Now complete the descriptor by writing sentences 2–4 following the patterns in the table. Next, select the ‘Answer’ button below.

Answer

A possible answer, set out sentence by sentence, is as follows:

  1. Quality of the mathematics: Correct mathematics throughout which demonstrates knowledge going beyond the content of the lectures as well as creativity, insight or innovation and is presented entirely correctly with all mathematical formalisms entirely error free.
  2. How much working is shown: All working is shown clearly with no additional or extraneous working. All mathematical formalisms are entirely correct throughout. 
  3. Clarity of reasoning: Reasoning is sound and well-communicated demonstrating knowledge that goes beyond the content of the module.
  4. Demonstration of understanding: Shows a profound understanding of concepts with evidence of creativity, insight or innovation that goes beyond the content of the module. 

Language Focus 1: Instruction verbs

This exercise looks at instruction verbs. These are verbs used to convey what a question or problem is asking you to do, and they appear frequently in exams, problem sheets, and coursework. Common examples in mathematics include calculate, demonstrate, find, and convert. Understanding the precise meaning of these verbs will help you both to answer exam and problem sheet questions accurately, and to discuss them with your peers and lecturers.

In Section 2 of the Assessment Brief, the LOs are stated:

  • LO1: Perform arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) on complex numbers in Cartesian form
  • LO2: Convert between Cartesian and polar forms and apply De Moivre's theorem to compute powers
  • LO3: Find complex roots of polynomial equations and apply the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
  • LO4: Represent complex numbers on an Argand diagram and interpret geometric transformations (addition, multiplication, conjugation)
  • LO5: Apply complex numbers to solve problems in mathematics, science and engineering contexts
  • LO6: Construct clear mathematical arguments, show all working, and justify solution methods
  • LO7: Reflect on your own learning progress and provide constructive feedback to peers

The grammatical form of these LOs is broadly consistent: each begins with an instruction verb (sometimes called an imperative verb or command verb), followed by a direct object, and often includes additional information such as prepositional phrases or purpose clauses.

The table below shows the grammatical structure of each LO:

LO Instruction verb (plus preposition if present) Object Preposition (if present) Anything else
1 Perform  arithmetic operations … on  complex numbers in Cartesian form
2a Convert between Cartesian and polar forms   NA (Not Applicable) (and …)
2b … apply  De Moivre's theorem  to  compute powers
3a Find   complex roots of polynomial equations NA (and …)
3b … apply the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra NA NA
4a Represent complex numbers  on an Argand diagram and 
4b interpret geometric transformations NA NA
5 Apply  complex numbers  NA to solve problems in mathematics, science and engineering contexts
6a Construct  clear mathematical arguments NA NA
6b show  all working,  NA (and …)
6c justify  solution methods NA NA
7a Reflect on  your own learning progress  NA (and …)
7b provide constructive feedback to peers NA NA

Question 1 - meaning: Study the table above and look up each verb in a good English dictionary. Note the meanings of each one and how these instruction verbs combine with objects and prepositions. When you feel you have an understanding of the meaning of these instruction verbs, work through the activity below.

Below, you will see nine of the instruction verbs from the table above, arranged into three groups of three. For each group, there are three corresponding sentences, each containing one gap. Your task is to complete each gap with an appropriate form of one of the three verbs in that group. Use both meaning and grammar clues to decide, referring back to the table above for guidance on how each verb is typically used. Next, select the ‘Answer’ button below.

Note that for any given verb, several forms are possible. For example, for the verb show, the possible forms include: the base (or bare infinitive) form show; the -ing form showing (identical to the present participle); and the past participle form shown.

Group A: perform, convert, apply

  1. Before you can add or multiply complex numbers in polar form, it often helps to             them into Cartesian form first.

  2. De Moivre's theorem can be             to find the nth roots of any non-zero complex number.

  3. To divide one complex number by another, you should             the operation by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator.

Group B: find, represent, interpret

  1. Using the quadratic formula,             the two complex roots of the equation [latex]z^2+z+1=0[/latex].
  2. Geometrically, we can             multiplication by [latex]i[/latex] as a rotation of [latex]90[/latex] degrees anticlockwise about the origin in the complex plane.
  3. An Argand diagram is the standard way of             a complex number as a point, or a position vector, in a two-dimensional plane.

Group C: construct, show, justify

  1.             an Argand diagram to illustrate the complex number [latex]z=3+4i[/latex] and its complex conjugate [latex]\bar{z} =3-4i[/latex].
  2. To             that [latex]z \bar{z}=|z|^2[/latex] for any complex number [latex]z[/latex], begin by writing [latex]z[/latex] in the form [latex]a+bi[/latex].
  3. Before applying De Moivre's theorem to simplify a power of a complex number, you should             why the formula holds for any integer exponent [latex]n[/latex].

 

Answer

Group A: perform, convert, apply

  1. Before you can add or multiply complex numbers in polar form, it often helps to convert them into Cartesian form first.

  2. De Moivre's theorem can be applied to find the nth roots of any non-zero complex number.

  3. To divide one complex number by another, you should perform the operation by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator.

Group B: find, represent, interpret

  1. Using the quadratic formula, find the two complex roots of the equation [latex]z^2+z+1=0[/latex].
  2. Geometrically, we can interpret multiplication by [latex]i[/latex] as a rotation of [latex]90[/latex] degrees anticlockwise about the origin in the complex plane.
  3. An Argand diagram is the standard way of representing a complex number as a point, or a position vector, in a two-dimensional plane.

Group C: construct, show, justify

  1. Construct an Argand diagram to illustrate the complex number [latex]z=3+4i[/latex] and its complex conjugate [latex]\bar{z} =3-4i[/latex].
  2. To show that [latex]z \bar{z}=|z|^2[/latex] for any complex number [latex]z[/latex], begin by writing [latex]z[/latex] in the form [latex]a+bi[/latex].
  3. Before applying De Moivre's theorem to simplify a power of a complex number, you should justify why the formula holds for any integer exponent [latex]n[/latex].

Question 2 - grammatical properties: The table below gives a breakdown of the verbs listed above in two columns:

  • Column 1: Examples showing how each instruction verb is used, with the verb and any associated prepositions underlined.
  • Column 2: The noun form of each instruction verb, with the endings underlined.

Note that two verbs (find and show) typically use the noun form -ing (see the grammar comments in the table).

Verbal form of the instruction verb Noun form of the instruction verb
perform a computation on X The computer's performance of these calculations is faster than we expected. 

Comment: we might also say execution of these calculations when speaking of a computer's work.

convert X to Y A very straightforward conversion of X to Y
find the solution to X Finding a solution to the problem was straightforward.  Grammar comment: We tend not to say The finding of a solution, even though this structure without The is common.
apply a theorem/ method to a calculation/ a problem The application of the theorem to the problem
represent some data on a diagram The representation of the data on the diagram 
interpret the data; interpret the result of the experiment   The interpretation of the result 
construct a step-wise argument which The construction of a step-wise argument 
show the approach that you have taken clearly Showing the approach you have taken is advised. Grammar comment: We tend not to say The showing of your approach, even though this structure without The is common.
justify your choice of topic for the project The justification of your choice for the project
reflect on your performance in the exam; Your reflection on your performance. Note the use of your instead of the .
provide clear guidance on the exam.  The provision of clear guidance on the exam. 

 

Your task: Using your knowledge of mathematics and the verb-noun patterns explored in this activity, match the two parts of the sentences below. Some sentences use the verbal form, while others use the noun form. Next, select the ‘Answer’ button below the table.

No. Part 1








Part 2
1 In data science, it is important to offer a methodologically sound interpretation … … for your topic as well as at least two sources that you are familiar with.
2 Consider enhancing the clarity of the representation of … … on how we learn, successes we enjoy and challenges we face. Learning is a rich and complex social activity and benefits from study as much as mathematics itself.
3 In an exam context, sometimes we need to show … … a clear argument as well as a text that conveys that argument equally clearly.
4 Please come to the second supervisor meeting with a clear justification … … ourselves to the subject with continued energy.
5 Learning formulae and calculations is critical; however, applying this knowledge … … of the data.
6 Becoming a self-directed learner involves, among other things, developing an ability to reflect … … your graphs and images. It's not always clear what the units of your axes are, for example.
7 Writing a project or thesis in mathematics requires us to construct … … our working, and for other questions simply the answer is sufficient. Read the question carefully!
8 Mathematics is not easy! We need to apply … … to novel problem sets is where the work really gets done.
Answer
No. Part 1 Part 2
1 In data science, it is important to offer a methodologically sound interpretation … … of the data
2 Consider enhancing the clarity of the representation of … … your graphs and images. It's not always clear what the units of your axes are, for example.
3 In an exam context, sometimes we need to show … … our working, and for other questions simply the answer is sufficient. Read the question carefully!
4 Please come to the second supervisor meeting with a clear justification … … for your topic as well as at least two sources that you are familiar with.
5 Learning formulae and calculations is critical; however, applying this knowledge … … to novel problem sets is where the work really gets done.
6 Becoming a self-directed learner involves, among other things, developing an ability to reflect … … on how we learn, successes we enjoy and challenges we face. Learning is a rich and complex social activity and benefits from study as much as mathematics itself.
7 Writing a project or thesis in mathematics requires us to construct … … a clear argument as well as a text that conveys that argument equally clearly.
8 Mathematics is not easy! We need to apply … … ourselves to the subject with continued energy.

Activity 3: The language of requirement and prohibition

The second bullet-point list in Section 4 of the Assessment Brief, repeated below, lists three items that are prohibited in the exam:

  • No calculator is allowed
  • No formula sheet will be provided
  • You may not bring notes or other materials

Similarly, Section 10 lists three requirements (things that must be done):

  • All work must be your own
  • In problem sets, you may discuss ideas with peers but must write your own solutions
  • In tests and exams, all work must be entirely your own (no collaboration permitted)

University life and exams, in particular, make reference to things that must not happen (prohibition) as well as things that must happen (required). Between these two extremes, there are several intermediate levels. The scale below shows five levels, arranged from strongest requirement to strongest prohibition, where both adjective and noun forms are given:

  1. Required/a requirement: something must be done or must happen.
  2. Recommended/a recommendation: it is a good idea to do this or for this to happen.
  3. Open/an option: this can either be done or not.
  4. Not recommended/not a recommendation:  it is advised not to do this.
  5. Prohibited/a prohibition: this is not allowed to happen.

Three main grammatical patterns are used to express these levels:

  1. Modal verbs. Examples: must (not), should (not), might (not) or may (not)
  2. Patterns with the a subject + verb be + an adjective. Examples: you are allowed to...; talking is prohibited; students are encouraged to … .
  3. Impersonal verb patterns with it is. Examples: it is strongly encouraged that you …; it is permitted to …; it is suggested that … .

Your task: Read the sentences below. Each sentence contains two examples of requirement / suggestion / prohibition language. First identify the two instructions per sentence. Then, classify each instruction according to the five-level scale above. Finally, decide whether the example belongs to pattern a), b) or c) above, or none, and highlight any word forms that indicate the degree of requirement or prohibition. Next, select the ‘Answer’ button below the sentences.

  1. You must not use a calculator for this exam. However, you may bring the list of formulae for the course to the exam if you wish. 
  2. Your project plan must be at most one page. It is strongly suggested that you discuss your thesis plan with a tutor before submitting it.
  3. Candidates are not permitted to speak once they enter the examination room. Candidates must raise their hand if they wish to ask a question. 
  4. You are strongly advised to use code for this project. However, it is up to you to decide how much of your code to include in the text of the project and how much to assign to the appendices. 
  5. In problem sets, you may discuss ideas with peers but must write your own solutions.
  6. Before the submission of the project plan, we encourage you at this stage to share your ideas with other students. However, after the plan has been returned by your supervisor, it is imperative that you follow the instructions in the document Working With And Sharing Ideas With Other Students.  
  7. The project must include a brief introduction as well as a conclusion section. However, within the main body, you do not have to use headings for this project.  
  8. While four meetings are required, your supervisor may agree to meet you occasionally outside of the four mandatory meetings. 
Answers
Example The two instructions Comments
a You must not use … 

However, you may bring … if you wish. 

Modal verb must (negative); Prohibited

Modal verb may; Open

b Your project plan must be …

It is strongly suggested that you discuss … 

Modal verb must; Required

Impersonal verb; Recommended

c Candidates are not permitted to speak ….

Candidates must raise their hand if they wish to ask a question.

Adjective structure; Prohibited

Modal verb must; Required

d You are strongly advised to use code for this project.

However, it is up to you to decide … 

Adjective structure; Recommended

Impersonal form; Open

e In problem sets, you may discuss ideas with peers …

… but must write your own solutions.

Modal verb may; Open

Modal verb must; Required

f … we encourage you at this stage to share your ideas with other students.

However, … it is imperative that you follow the instructions in …

The first one is a verb, and it is none of the given patterns.

Impersonal verb form; Required

g The project must include a brief introduction as well as …

However, … you do not have to use headings for this project.

Modal verb with must; Required

Negative modal verb do not have to; Open

h While four meetings are required, …

… your supervisor may agree to meet you occasionally … 

Adjective form; Required

Modal verb with may; Open

Language Focus 2: Pair work on instruction verbs

In Language Focus 1, you encountered instruction verbs alongside their noun forms (e.g. perform → performance). Two other sections of the Assessment Brief that contain instruction verbs are Section 5 and Section 7.

Your Task: Work in pairs, students A and B: student A takes Section 5, and student B takes Section 7. Each student should read their section, attempt the tasks below and then deliver a mini teaching session:

  1. Read the whole section and produce a short summary (2-3 sentences) of what it instructs students to do. State what the section is basically about as well as any additional relevant details.
  2. Working with the grammatical ideas in Language Focus 1, identify some other examples of instruction words in the section and note aspects of their surrounding grammar. In Section 5, the first instruction verb is Record. The object of this verb is a 1–2 minute video. In Section 7, the first instruction verb is attempt in the sentence Systematically attempt all problem sheet questions. The instruction verb occurs with the adverb Systematically and its object is all problem sheet questions. 
  3. Make any other comments on useful, significant or noteworthy language. For example in Section 5, we see the sentence The system will randomly pair you with another student. This may be considered useful, significant or noteworthy language as we have the word pair used as as verb with the adverb randomly. This is a noteworthy multi-word string and also has relevance to mathematical language. As a second example in Section 7, we see two uses of the adverb thoroughly. This is noteworthy as it reflects the tone of the section as it advises students to be systematic and careful in their preparation.

Here is some useful language to help you with the discussion:

  • Language to get the conversation started:
  1. Are we ready to start?
  2. Would you like to go first, or should I?
  3. I'll go first. So I've looked at Section 5 and I'll first give you a summary with some other bits of detail. Then I'll cover some of the instruction verbs and make a couple of other comments. Here we go! 
  • Language to summarise the main point with some hedging or softening language included:
  1. The main point of Section 5/7 is/seems to be …
  2. It seems to me that Section 5/7 is basically about …
  3. I'd say that the central idea in Section 5 /7 is …
  • Language for supplying additional details:
  1. Alongside this central message, Section 5 /7 also gives some details on …
  2. The additional details that are covered in Section 5/7 are firstly …, secondly … finally …
  3. I think there are essentially three other noteworthy details in Section 5 /7 which, are firstly … 

Language Focus 3: Endings and stress in adjectival mathematical terminology

This chapter is about Complex Numbers. In this two-word term, complex is an adjective and number is a noun. Mathematical language contains many adjectives, and understanding their form and pronunciation is important for clear communication. Each of the LOs in the Assessment Brief contains at least one adjective. The adjectives are underlined below, with the stressed syllable in bold:

  • LO1: Perform arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) on complex numbers in Cartesian form
  • LO2: Convert between Cartesian and polar forms and apply De Moivre's theorem to compute powers
  • LO3: Find complex roots of polynomial equations and apply the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
  • LO4: Represent complex numbers on an Argand diagram and interpret geometric transformations (addition, multiplication, conjugation)
  • LO5: Apply complex numbers to solve problems in mathematics, science and engineering contexts
  • LO6: Construct clear mathematical arguments, show all working, and justify solution methods
  • LO7: Reflect on your own learning progress and provide constructive feedback to peers

Note that all the underlined items in the LOs above are adjectives, not nouns. In English, nouns can also modify other nouns. Some examples from the same texts above are:

  • Argand diagram  (Argand is a noun used as modifier; diagram is the main noun)
  • mathematics contexts (mathematics is a noun; contexts is the main noun)
  • solution methods (solution is a noun; methods is the main noun)
  • learning progress (learning is a noun; progress is the main noun).

We are not focusing on these noun-noun combinations in this exercise. However, it is important to recognise that these are not adjective-noun combinations. If you wish to revise adjective + noun combinations in relation to noun + noun combinations (and other relevant patterns), see Language Focus 3 in Section 5.3.

Returning to adjectives, another important aspect of adjective grammar is whether adjectives have an ending, and if so, what that ending is. The endings of the adjectives identified above are, with the stress in bold:

  1. no ending: complex, clear
  2. -ic: arithmetic, geometric (from geometry)
  3. -ian: Cartesian from the name Descartes
  4. -ar: polar, from pole
  5. -(i)al: polynomial and mathematical (from mathematics)
  6. -ive: constructive (from construct)

Your task: Go through the text and identify as many adjectives as you can. For each one, consider the following:

  1. Does it have an adjective ending and what is that ending?
  2. If it has an ending, is there a similar word without that ending?
  3. Where is the stress? You may need to consult a good English dictionary for this.
  4. What noun follows the adjective?

For example, consider Section 3, repeated below for convenience:

Weekly problem sheets are a key learning tool. They help you practise the material covered in lectures. Problem sheets are set weekly in Weeks 1-4 and 6-8 (Week 5 is the mid-term test, and Week 9 is revision week). No mark is awarded (they count 0% towards your final mark), but they are essential for learning. There is no strict deadline.

The adjectives are the following, with the stressed syllable in bold: weekly; learning; essential; strict. The first three have an ending, the last one does not.

In this section, you have focused on longer written mathematical communication. To conclude the chapter, the final section provides a glossary of important mathematical terms from the chapter.

 

Licence

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

The Academic Language of Mathematics Copyright © 2026 by University of Leeds is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.